Is it on the way out in America?

I woke around 8, the glow of my phone lighting up warnings across every app: “Democracy in crisis,” “Elections under threat,” “Truth under siege.” Over orange juice and toast, I scrolled through clips of angry protests, viral conspiracy theories, and editorials predicting the end of free societies. It felt as if the very idea of self-rule had slipped through our fingers overnight, replaced by suspicion and outrage. Yet this panic masks deeper cracks that have been widening for years, waiting for the first sign of pressure to burst wide open. It made me feel uncertain about everything.

At its core, democracy leans on three intertwined pillars: free and fair elections that let every citizen cast a vote without fear; an independent judiciary that checks power; and a shared commitment to facts and open debate. The facts show that our government is trying to restrict voting, the Supreme Court seems to have forgotten the basic elements of the Constitution, and our President reinvents the news regularly. When our pillars stand firm, governments respond to public will, rights are protected, and policy debates unfold in good faith. But when one pillar shudders, the others strain, until the structures collapse into gridlock, fear, or outright authoritarianism. Is this what is happening to our democracy?

Political polarization is the slow poison inside many democracies today. Instead of swapping ideas, people bunker into online enclaves where algorithms reward outrage and vilify any dissenting view. Family group chats turn into battlegrounds, colleagues avoid talking politics, and the middle path—where compromise and pragmatic solutions live—erodes. As moderates vanish from public life, lawmakers cater to the loudest extremes, making collaboration nearly impossible.  Witness Lisa Murkowski, Senator from Alaska, who said she did not like the budget bill, but she protected Alaskans and voted for a “bad” bill.

Erosion of the rule of law follows a familiar script. In several countries, leaders stack courts with allies, rewriting judges’ job descriptions to fit political needs. What was once an independent bastion against abuse becomes a tool to silence critics, harass journalists, or fast-track controversial policies. When citizens lose faith that courts will apply rules evenly, they start to see the system as rigged—and many quietly disengage.

Outside actors seize on these weaknesses with surgical precision. In 2016, a wave of cyber-attacks and social-media bot campaigns targeted American voters, spreading false claims about candidates and voting procedures. These tactics weren’t limited to the U.S. In cyberspaces across Europe, Asia, and Latin America, the same digital Trojan horses stoked divisions—often riding atop existing resentments about immigration, inequality, or national identity.

Closer to home, gerrymandering and restrictive voter-ID laws quietly redraw the map of who actually gets to vote. Districts twist into bizarre shapes designed to dilute one group’s power and inflate another’s. (Witness the 6^th District of Virginia). Long lines at urban polling stations and sudden ID requirements in rural counties mean that, in practice, not every vote carries equal weight. The result is a public that doubts its own voice, fueling cynicism and reducing turnout.

Technology amplifies every one of these threats. I recently watched a video of a well-known politician saying things he had never actually uttered—deepfake magic crafted to confirm viewers’ worst suspicions. Social-platform algorithms then prioritize that content, rewarding clicks more than truth. As real and fake blur, we lose the foundation of shared reality, the bedrock required for any collective decision-making.

I have a friend in Eastern Europe who witnessed this erosion firsthand. A decade ago, her country celebrated multi-party elections and a free press. Today, independent news outlets struggle under onerous regulations, civic NGOs face constant audits, and the executive branch issues emergency decrees with scant oversight. What began as whispered changes in the law spiraled into a system where public protest is met with police batons—and most citizens simply stop showing up.

WOW!!! Could this happen to American Democracy?

This is not a Democrat or Republican issue. It is an issue for every American Citizen!  Democracy isn’t doomed if we act. But when J.D. Vance advocates for ignoring court decisions that impact executive orders, we (American citizens) have a problem. It means reading beyond headlines, talking to neighbors with different viewpoints, and holding leaders—at every level—accountable to rules they can’t rewrite on a whim. Democracy lives or dies in our daily actions, in conversations over kitchen tables and clicks that amplify honest reporting over sensational lies. The choice is ours, every single day.

T. Michael Smith

tom0261888@gmil.com